Validated leadership and the changes between them, headcount by department, funding and filings — with the firmographics underneath rather than standing in for the answer. One call, one company record.
Platforms shipping their own products on these records today.
Every provider returns a name, a domain and an industry. The record is worth integrating for the three groups above them — who leads the company, what changed, and what it has raised.
Validated leadership and the changes between them, and the decision makers inside the company — not an org chart guessed from titles.
Headcount by department and how each moved, what the company is hiring for, and the news attached to the record.
Funding status and stage, what has been raised, and the IPO and acquisition events where they exist.
Name and known aliases, domain, description, industry categories, employee count, founding date, locations and operating status.
The documented call, in full. Send the domains you hold and get the company record for each — the same record described above, so what you integrate against is what this page says it is.
Request01
POST /datasvc/company/fetch
{
"domain": [ "example.com" ]
}
Response02
{
"name": "Acme",
"domain": "acme.com",
"alias": [ "Acme Corp.", "ACME Holdings" ],
"founded_on": "1994-03-02",
"operating_status": "active",
"current_emp_count": 1420,
"location": { "city": "Austin", "country_code": "US" },
"industry_category_list": [ "Manufacturing", … ],
"insight": {
"funding_status": "series_c",
"total_funding_usd": 86000000,
"total_funding_rounds": 4,
"has_ipo": false
},
"ipo_rounds": [ … ],
"updated_at": "2026-08-04T11:20:00Z"
}
The first three are a single call. The fourth is why the record is still right six months after you stored it.
All the same call. The difference is which part of the record the team is there for.
Your CRM · account
One call, one record
A signup gives you a work domain and nothing else. The record arrives complete before a rep opens the row. For CRM and onboarding.
VP Data · on file
D. Novakno longer hereE. Haugencurrent
re-enriched on your cadence
Current, not remembered
The contact you mapped last year has left. Re-enrichment tells you before an email bounces off an empty seat. For account management.
Where the money is going
Headcount by department turns a flat firmographic score into one that reflects what the company is actually investing in. For scoring and routing.
Funding on the record
Stage, not guesswork
Funding status, stage and the filings behind them separate a funded scale-up from a company of the same size that is not. For qualification.
two rowsduplicatesone companyresolved
Aliases, not duplicates
Known aliases and the domain resolve two spellings of the same company into one account. For data teams cleaning a CRM.
Your product · company view
No second tab
Your users see a complete company without leaving to look it up somewhere else. For platforms with an account view.
Same record through every surface — the difference is only how many you ask for at once.
Resolve a domain at the moment of decision and get the company back.
The same enrichment inside Claude and ChatGPT, and any tool that speaks them.
A visual layer over the same APIs. Enrich real domains in a UI before anyone writes code.
We resolve and validate our own graph rather than reselling someone else’s, and the domains you send are not retained as a list of who you are working.
Security & Trust Centre
EU & UK
California
Audited
Send domains — one or many in the same call. Each resolves to a company record carrying leadership and the changes between them, headcount by department, funding and filings, and the firmographics underneath.
Because every provider has the firmographics. Name, domain and industry are the floor, not the reason to integrate. What changes a decision is who runs the company, which team is growing, and what it has raised.
Known aliases resolve to the same record, so two spellings in your CRM collapse into one account rather than two you reconcile by hand.
We do not hold web traffic, SEO metrics, review-platform ratings, social follower counts or competitor mapping. If your case depends on one of those, tell us and we will say plainly whether we are the right fit.
Re-enrich on a cadence, or take the whole set from the Company Dataset. Companies change leadership and size far more often than they change name, so refreshing the movers is usually enough.
No. We resolve and validate our own graph across 18+ data sources and reconcile them into a single answer.
Fifteen minutes, a handful of the accounts you already hold, and the company records we return for them.