Added this month
+412k+394k+374k+320k
US and India
A fresh cohort, monthly
Fill a pipeline that refills itself
Roughly 1.5M people enter the market every month, so a sourcing pipeline stops depending on the same names. For recruiting platforms.
Not a public “open to work” badge and not a guess from a job change — people who told a staffing partner they are in market. About 1.5M added every month across the US and India.
Platforms shipping their own products on these records today.












Most “in market” data is a guess dressed as a fact. This is the one place the difference is worth being pedantic about, because it decides whether an outreach lands or annoys.
| Active Job Seekers | The usual substitutes | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it comes from | Partnerships with staffing firms — the person told someone they are looking. | A public badge, or a job change inferred from a profile edit. |
| What it means | Present tense. They are in market now. | Past tense, or aspiration. They moved, or they once flagged interest. |
| Why it matters | A public “open to work” flag is not publicly available to buy, so anything sold as one is inferred. We would rather tell you where ours comes from than let you assume. | |
The signal lands on the same person record as everything else, so an in-market flag arrives with the work history that tells you whether they are worth calling.
That the person is actively looking, and when that became true — so you can act while it still is.
Work history with dates, skills and education from People Enrichment — the signal is not a name and a flag.
Current employer and title, so “looking” comes with the context of what they are looking to leave.
Location, so a role that cannot relocate is not matched against someone who would have to.
The second step is the one that makes it usable: a name from a staffing partner is not much on its own.
Every one of these is the same cohort, reached at a different moment.
Added this month
+412k+394k+374k+320k
US and India
A fresh cohort, monthly
Roughly 1.5M people enter the market every month, so a sourcing pipeline stops depending on the same names. For recruiting platforms.
K. Tanaka · Data Lead
Not lookinglast quarterIn marketnow
declared, not inferred
Present tense, not past
Being in market expires. The signal tells you the state now rather than that they changed jobs once. For talent teams.
Data engineers · Bengaluru
All profilesIn market
The few worth calling
About one in five people in a candidate database is looking at a given moment. Filter to the ones who said so and response rates lift around fivefold. For outbound recruiting.
Role needs
Fit, then availability
Skills and history decide fit; the signal decides whether the conversation is worth starting. For matching engines.
In market · by function
Supply, by role
Which functions have people available this month, so a hiring plan meets the market rather than fighting it. For talent intelligence.
Your product · candidates
Your users, your UI
Show your users who is open to a move, under your brand, over the same graph. For HR-tech platforms.
The same cohort through every surface — the difference is only how often you want it.
The in-market set delivered on your schedule, with each month’s intake included.
The same cohort inside Claude and ChatGPT, and any tool that speaks them.
A visual layer over the same APIs. Look at real records before anyone writes code.
This cohort comes from staffing-firm partnerships rather than from harvesting a site that forbids it, and the roles you are hiring for are not retained as a list of who you are chasing.
Security & Trust CentrePartnerships with staffing firms. Someone looking for a job tells a recruiter they are looking, in the ordinary course of looking. It is not scraped, and it is not bought from a badge.
No, and the distinction matters. That flag is not publicly available to license, so anything sold as one has been inferred. Ours is declared to a partner rather than guessed from a profile.
About 1.5M people are added every month. Being in market is a state that expires, so the intake is the product — a cohort from last year is a list of people who already found something.
The United States and India today. If you need another market, tell us and we will say plainly whether we can serve it rather than implying we already do.
Yes, and that is the usual pattern. The signal sits on the same person record, so People Search narrows on fit and the signal narrows on availability.
No. This tells you who is in market and who they are professionally. It does not supply contact details as an output.
Fifteen minutes, the roles you are actually filling, and how many people are in market for them right now.